← All problems
Unverified

Structure-Agnostic Minimax Risk for Partial Linear Models

Observe 2n2n i.i.d. triples (X,T,Y)(X,T,Y) satisfying

Y=θ0T+μ0(X)+εY,E[εY∣X,T]=0,T=π0(X)+εT,E[εT∣X]=0. Y=\theta_0T+\mu_0(X)+\varepsilon_Y,\quad \mathbb E[\varepsilon_Y\mid X,T]=0, \qquad T=\pi_0(X)+\varepsilon_T,\quad \mathbb E[\varepsilon_T\mid X]=0.

The nuisance functions μ0\mu_0 and π0\pi_0 belong only approximately to black-box classes Gμ\mathcal G_\mu and Gπ\mathcal G_\pi. Let δh,appr\delta_{h,\rm appr} and δh,stoc\delta_{h,\rm stoc} denote, respectively, the L2L_2 approximation error and the local-Rademacher stochastic error for nuisance h∈{μ,π}h\in\{\mu,\pi\}. A sample-split double-machine-learning estimator satisfies

∣θ^−θ0∣≲(δμ,appr+δμ,stoc)(δπ,appr+δπ,stoc)+n−1/2. |\widehat\theta-\theta_0| \lesssim (\delta_{\mu,\rm appr}+\delta_{\mu,\rm stoc}) (\delta_{\pi,\rm appr}+\delta_{\pi,\rm stoc})+n^{-1/2}.

Is this rate the best we can obtain under the worst-case structure-agnostic scenario? The unresolved issue is the role of variance: awareness of well-conditioned structures offers the possibility to mitigate the effects of variance, while that is not clear in structure-agnostic settings. Give the minimax rate and an estimator attaining it.

Coming soon

Organizer

Boyuan Wang portraitBoyuan Wang
Minghan Wang portraitMinghan Wang
Bochao Li portraitBochao Li
Hongwei Hu portraitHongwei Hu