Deciding upperboundedness of Z -CCRA

A cost register automaton (CRA) over $(\mathbb{Z}, \min, +)$ is a DFA equipped with a finite number of registers that take values in $\mathbb{Z}$. Each transition induces a transformation of the registers formulated with $\min$ and $+$; for instance $x \leftarrow \min\{x, y+3\} + z$. Accepting states can then output one of the registers. Consider the model in which: Each update uses only $\min$'s and addition with constants , For each transition, no register appears twice on the right-hand side of the updates. This model, which we call $\mathbb{Z}$-CCRA (the extra C standing for copyless ), can express for instance:

$$f(a^{i_1}\#\ldots\#a^{i_n}) = \min \{i_1, \ldots, i_n\}\enspace,$$

but couldn't express $g(b^i\#w) = i + f(w)$ ---this would require either copying $i$, or adding two registers. For weighted automata people, note that this model is equivalent to this, where $\mathcal{W}$ is a deterministic WA over $(\mathbb{Z}, \min, +)$: In [1], we showed that equivalence is undecidable for that model (even, and this is much more interesting, when restricted to $\mathbb{N}$). We also showed that it is undecidable, given a $\mathbb{Z}$-CCRA, to decide whether the function it expresses is always negative. Question: Is it decidable, given a $\mathbb{Z}$-CCRA, whether the function it expresses is upper-bounded? That is, whether $(\exists c)(\forall w)[f(w) \leq c]$. [1] S. Almagor, M. Cadilhac, F. Mazowiecki, G. A. Pérez. Weak Cost Register Automata are Still Powerful. DLT'18. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06336