Unverified

Reddit Post Reports NP-Completeness of the (2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property

A Reddit post by Severe-Ad8673 attributes to GPT 5.6 a manuscript claiming that recognition of the $(2,1)$-gapped consecutive-ones property is NP-complete via a reduction from 3-SAT; only a first-page screenshot is publicly supplied, so the complete proof and its authorship cannot be assessed from the linked materials.

Report typeProgress
Reported bySevere-Ad8673
ModelsGPT 5.6
Source dateAug 10, 2026

On August 10, 2026, Reddit user Severe-Ad8673 posted that GPT 5.6 had solved the recognition problem for the (2,1)(2,1)-gapped consecutive-ones property. The attached image shows the first page of a manuscript titled The (2,1)-Gapped Consecutive-Ones Property is NP-Complete, also dated August 10. The displayed abstract claims a reduction from 3-SAT proving that it is NP-complete to decide whether the columns of a binary matrix can be permuted so that the 1s in every row form at most two intervals separated by a single 0.

The screenshot presents this as resolving the exceptional case left open by the earlier complexity classification of gapped consecutive-ones properties. It also states a corollary: deciding whether changing at most one 0 to 1 in each row can produce the ordinary consecutive-ones property is NP-complete. The visible introduction says an accompanying script checks finite gadgets but is not part of the proof.

This report is necessarily limited: the Reddit post names GPT 5.6, but the screenshot does not identify a human author, and no complete manuscript or verification code is linked in the post. The claimed proof therefore cannot be assessed from the supplied public materials alone.

Coming soon

Organizer

Boyuan Wang portraitBoyuan Wang
Minghan Wang portraitMinghan Wang
Bochao Li portraitBochao Li
Hongwei Hu portraitHongwei Hu