Unverified

Matching Dependence for Approximately Dominating Sets in Elections

Moses Charikar, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, and Kangning Wang give an $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ lower bound for $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-dominating sets in elections, matching the known upper-bound dependence; they report that GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra generated the original proofs, which they streamlined and rewrote.

Report typeProgress
Reported byMoses Charikar, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, Kangning Wang
ModelsGPT-5.6 Sol Ultra
Source dateAug 6, 2026

In a preprint submitted on August 7, 2026, Moses Charikar, Prasanna Ramakrishnan, and Kangning Wang construct elections in which every (1/2−ε)(1/2-\varepsilon)-dominating set has size at least (1+o(1))/(32πε2)(1+o(1))/(32\pi\varepsilon^2). Together with the recent upper bound of order 1/ε21/\varepsilon^2, this establishes the asymptotically tight dependence Θ(1/ε2)\Theta(1/\varepsilon^2) and resolves the central open question up to the constant factor.

A set of candidates is approximately dominating when, for every candidate outside the set, a candidate drawn uniformly from the set defeats it with probability at least 1/2−ε1/2-\varepsilon. The authors say GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra originally generated both lower-bound proofs after being given the earlier paper and a prompt describing the problem. They subsequently supplied a streamlining idea and wrote their own exposition, and explicitly state that they take responsibility for the paper's contents.

Coming soon

Organizer

Boyuan Wang portraitBoyuan Wang
Minghan Wang portraitMinghan Wang
Bochao Li portraitBochao Li
Hongwei Hu portraitHongwei Hu